What is Animal Abuse (Cruelty)

Animal Abuse...I have never understood how there could be such a thing.

How is it some people who choose to have a pet in their family turn around and treat it in such a manner that it constitutes abuse?   An animal is not forced upon a person.  The person chooses to add a pet as an addition to their family.  It is really quite simple.... do not choose to add a pet to the family if you can not treat it in the manner in which it deserves to be.

It is my opinion that part of the problem is people have a differing opinion of what abuse is.  It would be safe to say that in most cases naiveté and lack of education are a major factor in people not knowing what constitutes animal abuse but sadly, some cases are people who are just plain cruel and heartless.

Animal Abuse can be catagorized in two ways;  Passive Cruelty (Acts of Omission) and Active Cruelty (Acts of Commission).

Information taken from Pet-Abuse.com

Simply put, passive cruelty is animal neglect.   It is not the act that is the crime it is the lack of the act is a crime. This is why passive cruelty is considered an Act of Omission.  These acts include starvation, dehydration, allowing a collar to be imbedded in their skin, parasite infestation and inadequate shelter in extreme conditions.   One act many do not see as abuse, but is quickly being added to laws as being so, is keeping your pets on a lead or chain outside for long periods of time.  This is the one type of abuse that can be attributed to lack of education, and therefore educating the abuser in many cases can cure the problem.

On the other hand, active cruelty, implies malicious intent.  This is where a person intentionally inflicts harm and pain.  A person who commits an act of active cruelty have got to be signs of psychological problems with regards to the perpetrator.   It has been noted that this type of crime has been linked to sociopathic behavior.

Some of the crimes of active cruelty are dog fighting, physical or sexual abuse to the animal, or using or killing the pet to intimidate their partner in a more severe case of domestic abuse.

Regardless the case intentional or unintentional the cases of animal abuse have increased and the amount of people being held accountable seems to be on the decrease.   Between the plea bargains abusers are given and the lacksidasical approach to animal abuse the perpetrators of these crimes look at what they are doing as nothing more than an inconvenience.

In many of these cases the victim, the animal, pays the price for the mistakes for the human who chose to "care" for them.   That in itself is what is wrong with animal abuse.

As in the case of dog fighting, more often than not, the dog is deemed as vicious and euthanized.  Yet those who commit the crimes are often given nothing more than a slap on the hands because the legality of animals being "property" and not "living creatures" seems to make the crime not as serious.

When I first saw the following video it was the epitome of my utter contempt for those who abuse animals.   Yes in these cases there is an animal... and it is not the dog.

                                        Peace For Dogs PSA on You Tube

Animal Abuse whether be neglect, intentional abuse or dogfighting must stop and laws must change to allow the punishment fit the crime where the perpetrator is the one who is held accountable and not the victim.